Try http://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/...s-than-conventionally-grown-food-201209055264It would be nice if you would back up your claims with a link, it's not helping anyone if we can't see from a reputable source that it's true or how it's true, or know where to start for more detail and information.
Also some food is actually worse for you than you realise, and many doctors and even the farmers who grown them won't eat them. If you look at that link it's for organic and regular alike, and should help if you want more info or details, workarounds etc.
A thing many will never consider is how the "organic" foods are actually grown. Direct application of a man made substance fertilizer/weedkiller would render it non-organic. Now consider "natural" fertilizers. What were the animals that produced that fed on?
If it has come out of a pit, in almost liquid form, then the animals will have been fed on non organic food.
Silage, whether it be the wrapped bale sort or from a silage pit. Isn't considered organic. Artificial nitrogen fertilizer will have been used, to help get the two, possible three cuts per year. The pit version is treated with chemicals, before covering & allowing it time to finish the process. Baled silage is wrapped to allow the same process to occur in a man-made, sealed enviroment to achieve similar results.
Given that often the fertilizer used is "natural", what the animal have been fed being non-organic. Is the end product "organic"?