SoCalZone10
Über Member
Yeah, that’s exactly what I thought, ridiculous. I wasted my time too.
I don't know the difference in cooking orange, lemon or grapefruit marmalade, because I've only ever done orange.I did overnight soaking, it didn’t help. Don’t believe the hype.

I boiled more than 2 hours, the skin was really soft, but the following day they didn’t jell. So I had to start over again.I don't know the difference in cooking orange, lemon or grapefruit marmalade, because I've only ever done orange.
I just looked at my recipe and it said: "4 whole lemons, plus oranges to make the weight up to 2 kgs (4.4 lbs). Bring to a boil and boil for at least 2 hours, until the skin is really soft. Allow to cool for 24 hours".
Basically what that does is release the natural pectin in the fruit, which is then reinforced with the pips/white pith the following day.
Yep, it's a pain.![]()
![]()
I've never been able to make orange marmalade like Robertson's, Wilkin's or Keiller's. I'm told that the secret is to use bitter, Seville oranges, which are more difficult to find here than an honest politician. Plus, of course, they've been making hundreds of tons for over 100 years. As long as mine jells (and I use exactly the same method as you, from what I can see), that'll have to do.My husband said it’s not as thick as the marmalade he bought from the store in England.

There's your reason.I looked up if I could "reboil" jam made with Stevia, NOPE!
There, I believe, is the problem.Stevia is not sugar, and marmalade needs sugar. It's not only the sweetness, it's also the volume of sugar which helps the marmalade set.I looked up if I could "reboil" jam made with Stevia, NOPE!
Well I'd agree, but I'd say baking is far more chemistry than cooking other stuff. Adding an extra tsp of cumin to a chutney definitely changes the final result - but don't ask me to come up with the formula and the precise chemical reactions.All cooking is chemistry, not sure if one keeps saying over and over again will make any difference.
Spot on!There, I believe, is the problem.Stevia is not sugar, and marmalade needs sugar. It's not only the sweetness, it's also the volume of sugar which helps the marmalade set.
When I ran my conserves company, I had a visit from the people who make Splenda.They asked me to test drive (if that's the right word!) some jam, marmalade, chutney recipes with splenda. Splenda (which is sucralose) is 600 times sweeter than sugar; 1 tsp (3 gms) of sucralose = 1.8 kgs (or 3.93 lbs ) sugar. Stevia is 2-300 times sweeter than sugar.
Anyway - first thing I did was to taste raw sucralose/splenda. Just a tiny bit. It was so damn sweet, I could still taste it 30 minutes later. I just had to walk down the road and buy some beer to take the taste away. If I made a comparison with one of my favourite food items, a Carolina Reaper chile is about 600 times stronger than a jalapeño.
The results of the experiment were dire, except for the mango chutney. The jams and marmalades tasted like fruit compote; baby food, and the texture was just all wrong. Far too liquid.
If you want to cut down on the sugar, then use fructose, which is twice as sweet as sugar. you can use half the amount, and that works.
I actually called a medical friend of mine who specialises in diabetes, and he said, yep, fructose is better than sugar. It cuts the risk by half...
Yes!!! Ninth grade biology/chemistry class when we learned all about cooked egg whites being white...All cooking is chemistry, not sure if one keeps saying over and over again will make any difference.
That bad!I just had to walk down the road and buy some beer to take the taste away.